I read in a Michael Moore newsletter that GM have a policy of 'planned obsolecence', the practice of building cars that won't last so as to generate further trade. I have a Vauxhall Zafira that has a FSH most at Vauxhall that has done 51k & has been meticulously well cared for. Already I have had to change the main engine ecu & I now have to fix an alarm that constantly goes off for no reason. There have been some little cabin breakages that are very inconvenient & the seats are not very comfy at all. The carpet is really cheap & nasty & almost impossible to clean as dirt gets trapped in the hairy pile. I used to wonder why this vehicle suffers so much when I am a particularly careful ownwer almost to the point of overdoing it. I think I know why now. So my question is, 'Why throw good money after bad'? Unless Vauxhall can drastically improve it's standards then would it not be better to let her die? Feel really sorry for the workers though but will government help really make much difference? What do you think?
 |
HOME
· Carpet flooring
BUY & FIT CARPET FLOORING
· Carpet Fitting
· Wholesale Carpet
· Carpeting Quotes
· DIY Carpets
· Carpet stairs
· Carpet Right
· Wilton Carpet
· Allied Carpet
CARPET MAINTENANCE & CLEANING
· Carpet Cleaning
· Carpet Cleaning Service
· Carpet Cleaner
· Vax Carpet Washer
· Carpet Steam Cleaner
· Karcher Carpet Cleaner
· Carpet Cleaner Kent
· Bissell Carpet Shampoo
TYPES OF CARPET
· Bathroom Carpet
· Kitchen Carpet
CARPET FLOORING ON THE WEB
· Carpet articles and questions
MORE LINKS
|
